She has achieved a real measure of success: “Starting with a practical dreamer’s sophisticated gamble on a new paradigm for staging contemporary opera, the company is now a potent creative force.” (New York Times)But when I did some googling about her I found a further aspect about her that I wanted to address: her self-knowledge. She came to this project with a great educational and experiential background: degrees in vocal performance and vocal pedagogy and years of teaching voice at the Tanglewood Institute. At some point she realized that her own voice just wasn’t up to a career onstage, and she found auditions to be nervewracking and paralyzing. As she analyzed her interests, her strengths and her weaknesses, she came to the conclusion that she’d be better off working behind the scenes. “I think the performer thing wasn’t right, because it was all about me, all about me. The minute that it could be not about me at all, and about everything else, then I relaxed and became very excited and passionate.” (NYT)
And this aspect of the story reminded me of two ideas gained last week from a couple of sources I’ve used before.
First, the teaching director of my Bible study class: “No tree can grow except on the root from which it sprung.” She was using the statement in a spiritual sense, that we can’t have fruit in our lives that doesn’t grow from the beliefs in our hearts, and that’s the most important aspect. But it’s also true in a more general sense. You cannot build a life that does not spring from your true nature.
Second (of course), Gretchen Rubin’s podcast. Gretchen and Liz discussed personality quizzes last week and how they can be genuinely useful in helping us understand ourselves. This type of self-examination is an obsession of Gretchen’s; her next book is an in-depth examination of her theory of the Four Tendencies. (It was supposed to be a brief booklet and ballooned into over 100,000 words. as Liz said, “Only you, Gretchen, only you.”) Several quizzes were mentioned on last week’s podcast; I ended up taking the Enneagram one, since it was free and could be scored online by the site, without my having to add up my points myself. I can’t say that I found this test to be too enlightening, as I ended up having two highest-scoring personality types: the Motivator/Achiever and the Thinker/Observer, with the Reformer/Perfectionist only one point lower. So I’m kind of muddled. But I plan to read through the thorough descriptions of my three top types and see what applies. The Reformer label seems to fit very well, as I tend to think that people should/can just change of I only tell them what to do.
It never works to force yourself into doing what you hate, not as your mission in life, anyway. I’d better end this and go read my personality descriptions. One thing I do know: I love writing these posts. By sheer serendipity I’ve fallen into doing something that suits me. I would write them even if no one read them, but I’m heartened by those who do!
I love to know what you think about anything! Thank you for writing.